Critique Monogamy?

by Addie Boswell
Published on: March 26, 2012
Categories: Other Topics
Tags:No Tags
Comments: No Comments

Having been together now for nearly five years, we Scrivas consider ourselves a committed group. But Viva Scriva wasn’t our first love. No, most of us had 2-5 critique groups before. Like all relationships, they came to an end for a variety of reasons. The personalities didn’t jibe. The long-term goals were different. The timing was simply off. Now entering the mature phase of our group, we trust and support each other all the more. But… don’t assume we’re monogamous. In fact, you might be shocked to know the kind of “alternative” critiquing that goes on behind the scenes.

:ScrivaAmber, in her trans-media project Angel Punk, gets storyline critique and general big-picture editing from the non-writers who encompass her creative team and her investors.

:ScrivaLiz “hires” college students to act as writing interns. In exchange for editing her manuscripts and performing a range of other duties (research, transcription, marketing), Liz teaches the interns editing and writing career practices. As the most prolific Scriva, Liz also has a second critique group sometimes to keep up with demand.

:ScrivaRuth went one step further and partnered with a whole graduate student class (Ooligan Press at PSU) to put the just-released Blue Thread through the editorial wringer. Besides providing line edits and developmental letters, they also created the book’s design and marketing plan.

:And I had an epiphany a few years ago that my art could benefit from critique. So now I have an illustration group that meets monthly, and a “drawing buddy” I meet with once a week. (Single critique buddies are especially helpful for dipping your toes in, or if you write in a very specific genre.)

:And then there are editors and agents and copywriters, and sometimes researchers and experts, people you can hire. Online critique. Phone critique. Improv critique. Oh my!

After a bad group or some ugly feedback, its tempting to give up on the idea altogether. And we all know great writers who don’t show their work to anybody. But we writers who want to work consistently take our critique consistently, even when its painful and we don’t agree. So go find your perfect relationship. Break up and start over. Mate for life. Swing. Just, make sure you get your critique.

Tips for Creating Buzz

by Addie Boswell
Published on: February 24, 2012
Categories: Other Topics
Tags:No Tags
Comments: 3 Comments

Have you heard about Blue Thread, Ruth Tenzer Feldman’s romp through time and social politics? Scriva Ruth’s book is getting great local buzz, thanks to the book itself–and some very smart marketing by the author and her team at Ooligan Press. (Read more about Ruth’s partnership with Portland State students here.) “Buzz” is that nebulous term we all want: other people to find, talk about, and share our books with their ever-expanding networks. We assume good books will create their own buzz, but still: what can an author do to help?

The main thing I’ve learned by watching Ruth is: Involve all the people you can! While having 30 students critique your book may sound like a particular form of torture, think of an extra 30 “agents” invested in the book’s success. Think of those agents as young, connected, and well-versed in social media, and you’ll start to wonder where you can find your own college class. Here are some other people you might think about involving:

  • Your neighbors. If you frequent a library, restaurant, or small business in your neighborhood, they might be a good fit. In Ruth’s case, she connected with her neighborhood branch of Albina Community Bank, to participate in their “First Thursday” art walk (details below).
  • Groups that fit your niche.  This works especially well for nonfiction titles: in Blue Thread‘s case, Ruth sought out Jewish-themed organizations and publications across the country, as well as organizations celebrating the women’s suffrage movement. (Set in 1912, the book’s publication date was set to coincide with centennial events in Oregon.)

    Ruth in 1912 costume

  • A local non-profit. ScrivaLiz did this when she launched For the Love of Music: The Remarkable Story of Maria Anna Mozart. Not only did Liz involve a guest musician, she benefited Ethos, a nonprofit that spreads music to kids. (She and Ruth also both developed historical costumes for their events — always a big hit!)
  • And finally: your FAF — my shorthand for the “Friends and Family” network. Don’t underestimate this gold mine of support. Your FAF wants your book to succeed just as much as you do, and it feels great to support other people you believe in. You also get a secondary benefit when you link up with friends: the reassuring faces take some of the stress off “pushing” yourself. For the First Thursday event, Ruth invited local women authors and artists (including me) who fit the theme of women in history. Now you’re invited too!

Nest of Words, paper

Thursday, March 1, 6-9 p.m.

Artists and Writers CelebrateWomen’s History Month

Albina Community Bank (in the Pearl)

430 NW 10th Ave., Portland

Authors will sell and sign their books, which are primarily, but not exclusively, for children or young adults. Joining Feldman are Carmen Bernier-Grand (Alicia Alonso: Prima Ballerina and Frida [Kahlo]: ¡Viva la Vida! Long Live Life!), Pamela Smith Hill (Laura Ingalls Wilder: A Writer’s Life), Barbara Kerley (The Extraordinary Mark Twain (According to Suzy) and What To Do about Alice [Roosevelt]), Michelle McCann (Luba: The Angel of Bergen-Belsen and Girls Who Rocked the World), and Elizabeth Rusch (For the Love of Music:  The Remarkable Story of Maria Anna Mozart, a biography of Wolfgang’s musical sister). All of these women have won state or national awards for their work.

Artists Addie Boswell and Sine Morse will display vibrant oil paintings and paper designs inspired by children and by Portland. Their work, as well as Feldman’s suffrage book, will be available for sale for the month of March.

Dreams, Hopes, Goals …and just Being

by Addie Boswell
Published on: January 25, 2012
Tags:No Tags
Comments: No Comments

It is that time of year. Time to clean out the cobwebs, recommit to lost intentions, and generally look at your life afresh. By the first week of January, I’ve usually written a new business plan with goals and objectives, color-coded my new planner, set income projections, figured my taxes, consulted the Tarot and made a vision board for the year. (I love to plan.) But this year I’ve been running into the idea of letting it all go. First, the Scrivas shared this post by Jeff Korhan: Forget Goals – Plan for Being Happy in 2012.  Then the New York Times kicked January off with the laughable success rate of both Resolutions and Dieting. Sabina recently wrote this post about the need for intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. And all of this is striking a chord with my own growing frustration: my career is in a bit of a rut and I need to approach something differently.

My mother says if you run into the same person three separate times, it means they have a message for you. I would say the same thing of ideas. The message I’m taking for myself is to stop thinking so much about the outcomes and returns I want and reconnect to the process.  For  what I want more than anything is to be absorbed and enlivened by my work.

Is it as hard to change your perspective as it is to change your waistline? Can I let go of my propensity for daily lists? I’m not sure. But the Scrivas are having our annual business and goals meeting next week, and the conversation will continue.  These are some of the questions we will be reflecting on.

  • When you look back on your career in 2011, when were you the happiest?
  • Why do you continue to write?
  • What can you offer the world that no one else can?

 

Weekly Writing Workshops

by Addie Boswell
Published on: January 19, 2012
Categories: Other Topics
Tags:No Tags
Comments: No Comments

How Writing Groups Can Work For You

Check out this post from Write It Sideways, where Susan Bearman talks about a different kind of group: workshops that meet weekly and have guest speakers.

Yes, your query letter needs critiqued too.

by Addie Boswell
Published on: December 22, 2011
Categories: Other Topics
Tags:No Tags
Comments: No Comments

I have been writing the same query letter for over a year now. And it’s all my critique group’s fault. It goes like this:

October, 2010: My first YA novel is well into its second draft, and I am eager to start querying agents. I submit the query letter to the Scrivas to be critiqued.  The general response: This letter is fine, but… Are you sure you’re ready? They know my manuscript still has months of editing to go, so much that I struggle writing the synopsis, because motivation is unclear. I put the query down.

March, 2011: Still slogging through my revisions, I decide I’m wasting time waiting on my novel, and I should query agents for my other picture book manuscripts, which are polished and ready to go. I edit my query and my list of agents and submit it again. The general response: This letter is fine, even good, but… You should wait for your novel. Picture books are hard to sell now, but YA novels are hot, and the Scrivas know my novel is my strongest hook. Sighing this time, but knowing they’re right, I put the query down again.

October, 2011: My novel is finished! Despite the variety of minor problems, I feel confident about its quality and its story arc in a way I didn’t before. And when I submit my query again, the Scrivas know this, having seen it through with me. The general response? This is okay, but… You can make it better.

November, 2011: I edit the query and submit it a fourth time and finally get the words I long for the Scrivas to say: “Send it out!”

Whew. These ladies are hard to please, and they tell me things I really don’t want to hear. Lucky I have learned to listen to them anyway. Frankly, its a relief to have guidance (even the whip-cracking kind) in my oft-unstructured freelance life.

Do you know your Reading Bias?

by Addie Boswell
Published on: November 15, 2011
Tags:No Tags
Comments: 1 Comment

Recently ScrivaAmber submitted a manuscript written in two points of view: a sarcastic male teenager, and a charming twelve-year old girl.

I was drawn to the teen character and wanted more of his voice. ScrivaLiz was drawn to the younger character and wanted more of her. The rest of us split somewhere between those two poles. This split happens sometimes, and tends to tell the writer: either direction would work, which do you favor? But it made me think more about how we critique and the bias we bring to the table.

For the last three years, I’ve been reading almost strictly YA titles, leaning towards male protagonists and gritty plots. No surprise that I favored the teen. Maybe no surprise that I can be hard on Middle Grade Novels, which sometimes leave me lukewarm. Where’s the drama? Where’s the tension?

That critique group was kind of an awakening. As a reader, I suppose there will always be bias — or to put it more gently — personal preference, in reading. But it is good to recognize my own, and it made me wonder: does objectivity just get harder the more we work together? Can you get entrenched in your genre if you read too much of it? I remain glad that the Scrivas write and read in a range of genres, because it expands my personal repertoire. It took three years of reading the fabulous nonfiction titles of Liz and Amber to make me appreciate that genre, and even want to write one myself.  Maybe I’ll even understand steampunk one of these days…

Women Channeling Teenage Boys

by Addie Boswell
Published on: October 24, 2011
Tags:No Tags
Comments: 2 Comments

S.E. Hinton knows boys, in the Outsiders.

This year, the Scrivas have featured quite a few teen and preteen boy characters in our novels, along with multicultural, historical, and superhero characters of both genders. Considering that we are white, middle-class women spanning the middle decades (as many childrens’ writers, librarians, and teachers tend to be), I believe we do a good job of letting our characters speak in their own, distinctive voices.

But the fact remains: we’ve never been teenage boys.  And raising them, or befriending them, or having them as brothers and boyfriends (even wanting to be them, in my case) is not the same as walking the walk. When writing my current YA novel, I sometimes wondered if I was getting 16-year-old Carlos’s reactions “right”? And also, in an edgy, coming-of-age boy book, is it honest to avoid cursing and sex and (god forbid) masturbation altogether?

Even in fiction, writing “true” means doing your research. It is a lesson I have learned well, for Scrivas are painstaking and thorough when researching their nonfiction and historical fiction titles. This is what most helped me get closer to boy-think.

  • Read what boys are reading. There is a common belief in publishing that boy readers skip YA altogether and go straight to adult fantasy and nonfiction. But I hope not, because it would be a shame to miss the excellent body of YA “boy” books out there. One thing I loved in these books: Action Rules, plots move quickly, and dialogue is clipped and to the point. Note: I found sex and slang both understated; a little goes a long way.
  • Read kick-ass boy protagonists by kick-ass male authors. Some of my favorites: The Chocolate War, Robert Cormier, Chaos Walking series, Patrick Ness, Punkzilla, Adam Rapp, Tales of the Madman Underground, John Barnes, Ship Breaker, Paolo Bacigalupi, Whale Talk, Chris Crutcher, Fighting Ruben Wolfe, Markus Zusak. I’ve read plenty of kick-ass boys written by women as well — find titles at Guys Read or Guys Lit Wire.
  • Watch teenage boys in action. Recently ScrivaMelissa and I met at Burgerville during high school lunch hour and observed the species up close. What slang! What quick speech and movements! (We almost saw a fight!) I also hung out with some Brazilian teenagers, and was amazed by how affectionate the guys were with each other. Into the book it all goes.

It goes without saying that that the children’s publishing industry needs more racial diversity and gender balance. I would love to see teenage boys writing about their own lives. But in the meantime, we women have work to do, and we will strive to do right by our characters.

Read Your Way to Great Writing

by Addie Boswell
Published on: September 13, 2011
Tags:No Tags
Comments: 2 Comments

This just in: Portlanders read like fiends! For the ninth year in a row, Multnomah County Library patrons checked out and renewed more items than other city our size; only the New York Public Library circulates more books. This is probably one of the reasons I feel so at home here. People love books and they love to talk about books.

The Scrivas are no exception; just consider Sabina’s bookshelves (double parked stacks) or Liz’s library card (known to top 200 check-outs) to see how voracious we are. I suspect that all writers share this trait; for as author Richard Peck puts it, “You stand on the shoulders of every book you’ve ever read.” Another phrase I’ve heard repeatedly is, “You must read 100 books before you can write one.” I took this advice particularly when I started writing my first young adult novel, a genre I hadn’t touched since 1988 when I finished the last Sweet Valley High book. (YA has come a loooong way since then.)  Two years later, I’ve read 158 YA novels.

I know the number because I also started doing something new with my reading: recording what I thought. In my mini-notebooks, I jot down a grade for each book and what I liked/didn’t like. While I’m sure all the reading has improved my manuscript, the note-taking has given me a better handle on the market. (So when I write my query letters this month, I can cite books and authors that are comparable.) But just as importantly, I’ve rediscovered a lost love, and become such a convert to YA that I’ve nearly given up adult fiction altogether. Some mornings, I marvel at the sheer joy of this profession– a job that beguiles me to read all I want. (And soon after, I start to feel guilty and return to my computer.)

If you’re just entering the genre, here is a list of YA novels that people passed on to me and I fell in love with. (most fall in the gritty contemporary category for ages 14-up)

  • Graceling, Kristin Cashore
  • Speak, Fever, Chains, and everything else by Laurie Halse Anderson
  • Tallulah Falls, Christine Fletcher
  • 13 Reasons Why, Jay Asher
  • When You Reach Me, Rebecca Stead
  • The Book Thief, Fighting Ruben Wolfe, and everything else by Marcus Zusak
  • The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau Banks
  • Lost, Jacqueline Davies
  • Whale Talk, Chris Crutcher
  • How I Live Now, Meg Rosoff
  • The Adoration of Jenna Fox, Mary E. Pearson
  • Goose Girl and others by Shannon Hale
  • Nothing, Janne Teller
  • Revolver, Marcus Sedgewick
  • The Chocolate War, Robert Cormier
  • Ship Breaker, Paolo Bacigalupi
  • Dark Water, Alice McNeal,
  • Tomorrow, When the War Began, John Marsden
  • The Knife of Never Letting Go, Patrick Ness
  • Crank, Ellen Hopkins
  • Tales of the Madman Underground, John Barnes
  • Punkzilla, Adam Rapp
  • Chime, Franny Billingsley

Link: Care and Feeding of Critique Groups

by Addie Boswell
Published on: August 20, 2011
Categories: Other Topics
Tags:No Tags
Comments: No Comments

Visit Eric Witchey’s article in Writer’s Magazine, headlined: The care and feeding of high-functioning critique groups  (Published: November 28, 2008)  Suggestions on “How to obtain sharp, useful critiques” at group meetings and avoid wish-washy responses.

 

In MY Version of Your Story…

by Addie Boswell
Published on: August 16, 2011
Tags:No Tags
Comments: 3 Comments

I was struck by this phrase, thrown out (in jest) as the Scrivas talked about edits. The phrase calls to mind all well-meaning advice, including: ‘If I were you…” If it was me…” “If you were smart about it…”  You probably get the same instant physical reaction that I do to these phrases: clam up, shut down, tune out. Nobody likes a talking head. If parents and priests give advice, think of critique groups as giving ideas and suggestions, and most of all — encouragement.

It is a subtle difference, and more difficult than it seems. Advice pops into your head all the time as you’re critiquing. We get attached to each others’ stories, after all, and start to think we have some say in them. Many times I’ve been reading a manuscript and thought, “Oh, if only the character would do this.” And maybe this would be the perfect answer to the plot problem, maybe this would finish the book. But it doesn’t matter, because this is not my story.  Giving advice may only mildly annoy the writer, but it may have more serious consequences. Like causing her to distrust your objectivity or to distrust her own voice or the arc of her story. Bad critique, indeed.

Let’s look at some examples.

  • You should have your heroine dump Steve and go for Nick.
  • The whole romantic angle doesn’t work for me.
  • Can you have her fall in love with someone else?

One is too specific (and advice-laden), two is too general (and snarky), and the third is… Well, its just okay. A question can be a great vehicle. Consider these much subtler variations:

  • I’d like more tension between the love interests.
  • I wonder if Nick can be fleshed out more.
  • Is there another way to show the heroine’s personal growth?

These work especially well if you follow them up with specific edits like, “I’ve marked places where Nick isn’t as clear.” or “Here’s a scene where you do it perfectly.” The last question may be the best edit if it gets to the heart of the problem, which may not be Steve or Nick or romance, but the heroine’s development. One more option–if you just can’t help yourself–is to cage your ideas in a list of choices, for example:

  • Is there another way to show the heroine’s personal growth? For example, what if she swears off dating, or falls in love with someone else, or has some other epiphany/crisis?

While these are definite suggestions, they are phrased in a way that lets the writer stay firmly in the driver’s seat.

Can this subtle difference be clarified any more? Do you have examples of good and bad edits you’ve received?  Join in!

page 1 of 2

Welcome , May 18, 2012